Skip to content

report · Scaffold reference reports · 18 August 2026

The Mauna Loa CO₂ record as a reference dataset

How a sixty-year atmospheric series is published, versioned and cited — and what environmental-economic accounts can borrow from it

  • CSDR Platform TeamCentre for Sustainable Development ReformAnalysis and production
Version
1.0
Licence

This report is the scaffold's long-form demonstration: a `type: report` document with a cover page, a contents page and running headers in its PDF. It re-uses the atmospheric CO₂ analysis cells built for the Mauna Loa reference analysis, but frames them the way an institutional report would — background, data and methods, results, implications — so that every part of the report template that only matters at length (section hierarchy, pagination, cross-references across pages, print furniture) is exercised against real data.

Summary

Key messages

  • Atmospheric CO₂ at Mauna Loa reached 429.12 ppm in July 2026; the 2025 annual mean of 427.35 ppm is 111.4 ppm above the first full year of the record (1959).
  • The record is a model of how a long-lived dataset should be published: stable files, explicit provenance, a documented method, and a citation request from the publisher.
  • Environmental-economic accounts that cite an atmospheric baseline should carry the same lineage — file, version, publisher — next to the number, which is what the scaffold’s data-bundle contract does.

Monthly mean, July 2026

429.12ppm

NOAA GML, Mauna Loa

Annual mean, 2025

427.35ppm

+111.4 ppm since 1959

Growth rate, 2025

2.23ppm/yr

± 0.11

Annual mean increase

Background

The measurement programme

The Mauna Loa series is the longest continuous direct record of atmospheric CO₂, begun by Charles David Keeling in March 1958 (Keeling et al., 1976) and continued by NOAA since 1974 (Thoning et al., 1989). The current files are published by NOAA’s Global Monitoring Laboratory (Lan et al., 2026). Its longevity is the point: a measurement that has been made the same way, at the same place, for more than sixty years, with every change of instrument or procedure documented.

Why an accounting scaffold cares

For SEEA (System of Environmental-Economic Accounting)-style work the value of a series like this is not any single number but its lineage. An account that cites an atmospheric baseline needs to know which file, which version and which publisher’s citation applies (United Nations et al., 2021). This report follows the data from NOAA’s files, through a versioned bundle, to the figures below.

Data and methods

The bundle

The values on this page are read at build time from the noaa-mlo-co2 bundle described under Data: monthly means, annual means and annual growth rates, with NOAA’s flags for interpolated months carried through. Nothing in the text is typed by hand — change the bundle, rebuild, and the numbers update.

Treatment of gaps

The rules below say what each treatment does to the series a reader sees (Table 1). They are prose, not numbers, so they are written here rather than computed; the table is kept out of the presentation deck and printed as records rather than as a grid, because each row is a paragraph.

Table 1.How gaps and anomalies in the record are treated, and what each treatment changes.Source: Method notes for this report; NOAA GML documentation for the flags.
SituationWhat NOAA publishesWhat this report doesEffect on the series shown
Interpolated monthThe monthly file keeps the month with a value interpolated from the neighbouring months and marks it with a negative standard deviation and a negative uncertainty, so a reader can tell an observed mean from a filled one.Excludes the month from the monthly series and from the seasonal-cycle figure and table, so every plotted point is an observed mean; annual means are taken from NOAA’s own annual file, which already accounts for the fill.A short gap in the monthly line and in the seasonal table for that month; no change to the annual means, the growth rates or the headline numbers.
Observatory closed (December 2022 – July 2023)Values from Maunakea, about 21 miles to the north, stand in for Mauna Loa for the months the observatory was unreachable after the eruption, and the file says so month by month.Keeps the stand-in months, because NOAA judges them comparable for the monthly mean, and says in the reading note that they come from a different site.None in the numbers; the note is the whole treatment, so that a reader who compares these months with another Mauna Loa product knows why they may differ slightly.
A revised release of the filesEach file carries a creation date; earlier values can change when the calibration scale or the fill method is revised, usually by hundredths of a part per million.Records the release date in the bundle manifest, checksums every file, and reports the version in the citation block, so a number quoted from this page can be traced to the release it came from.Numbers can differ from a copy built from an older or newer release; the difference is documented rather than hidden, and a rebuild from the same bundle is identical.

Source: Method notes for this report; NOAA GML documentation for the flags.

Results

The long-term trend

View data
yearAnnual mean (ppm)
1959315.98
1960316.91
1961317.64
1962318.45
1963318.99
1964319.62
1965320.04
1966321.37
1967322.18
1968323.05
1969324.62
1970325.68
1971326.32
1972327.46
1973329.68
1974330.19
1975331.13
1976332.03
1977333.84
1978335.41
1979336.84
1980338.76
1981340.12
1982341.48
1983343.15
1984344.87
1985346.35
1986347.61
1987349.31
1988351.69
1989353.2
1990354.45
1991355.7
1992356.54
1993357.21
1994358.96
1995360.97
1996362.74
1997363.88
1998366.84
1999368.54
2000369.71
2001371.32
2002373.45
2003375.98
2004377.7
2005379.98
2006382.09
2007384.02
2008385.83
2009387.64
2010390.1
2011391.85
2012394.06
2013396.74
2014398.81
2015401.01
2016404.41
2017406.76
2018408.72
2019411.65
2020414.21
2021416.41
2022418.53
2023421.08
2024424.61
2025427.35

Download data (CSV)Download chart (SVG)

Figure 1.Annual mean atmospheric CO₂ at Mauna Loa Observatory, dry-air mole fraction.Source: NOAA GML (Lan, Tans & Thoning, 2026); Scripps Institution of Oceanography for 1958–1974.

Figure 1 shows the annual mean since 1959. The curve is not a straight line: the increment added each year has grown from under one part per million in the early 1960s to two-to-three parts per million in most recent years (Figure 2).

The rate of increase

View data
yearAnnual increase (ppm/yr)
19590.94
19600.5
19610.96
19620.65
19630.71
19640.31
19651.06
19661.28
19670.69
19681.06
19691.35
19701
19710.8
19721.74
19731.18
19740.96
19751.09
19760.79
19772.15
19781.3
19791.83
19801.68
19811.43
19820.86
19832.36
19841.51
19851.21
19861.47
19872.06
19882.24
19891.24
19901.2
19911.05
19920.49
19931.36
19941.95
19952.01
19961.24
19971.91
19982.97
19990.92
20001.62
20011.62
20022.51
20032.26
20041.59
20052.57
20061.69
20072.31
20081.54
20092
20102.3
20111.92
20122.65
20131.99
20142.17
20152.95
20163.03
20171.9
20182.85
20192.49
20202.3
20212.35
20221.84
20233.32
20243.33
20252.23

Download data (CSV)Download chart (SVG)

Figure 2.Annual increase in atmospheric CO₂ at Mauna Loa (difference between successive annual means).Source: NOAA GML.

Decadal averages make the acceleration plain (Figure 3, Table 2): about 0.86 ppm per year in the 1960s against about 2.42 ppm per year in the 2010s.1

View data
decadeMean annual increase (ppm/yr)
1950s0.94
1960s0.86
1970s1.28
1980s1.61
1990s1.51
2000s1.97
2010s2.42
2020s2.56

Download data (CSV)Download chart (SVG)

Figure 3.Mean annual increase by decade. The final, partial decade is shown for completeness.Source: NOAA GML; CSDR calculation.
Table 2.The last ten annual means and their year-on-year increases.(ppm)Source: NOAA GML.
YearAnnual mean (ppm)Increase on previous year (ppm)
2016404.413.03
2017406.761.90
2018408.722.85
2019411.652.49
2020414.212.30
2021416.412.35
2022418.531.84
2023421.083.32
2024424.613.33
2025427.352.23

Source: NOAA GML.

The seasonal cycle

View data
month2022 (ppm)2023 (ppm)2024 (ppm)2025 (ppm)2026 (ppm)
Jan418.13419.47422.8426.65428.62
Feb419.24420.31424.55427.09429.35
Mar418.76421425.38428.15430.15
Apr420.19423.3426.51429.64431.12
May420.97424.01426.9430.51432.34
Jun420.94423.68426.91429.61431.44
Jul418.85421.83425.55427.87429.12
Aug417.15419.68422.99425.48
Sep415.91418.5422.03424.37
Oct415.74418.82422.38424.87
Nov417.47420.46423.85426.46
Dec418.99421.86425.4427.49

Download data (CSV)Download chart (SVG)

Figure 4.Monthly mean CO₂ for each of the last five years. Interactive: hover for values, click legend entries to compare years. An interactive version is online.Source: NOAA GML.

Within each year, CO₂ at Mauna Loa peaks in May and reaches its minimum in September or October (Figure 4), as Northern-Hemisphere plants draw down carbon through the growing season and release it in autumn and winter. The amplitude is a few parts per million — small against the trend, but a useful reminder that a single month’s reading is not a year’s mean.

The same five cycles as a table (Table 3): the May peak and the autumn trough are visible in every column, and reading down any month shows the trend running through the seasons. In print the table takes a landscape page of its own — six columns of tabular numbers are a comparison, not a list — with the report’s running furniture and the table’s title repeated on every page it occupies.

Table 3.Monthly mean CO₂ for each of the last five years.(ppm)Source: NOAA GML.
Month20222023202420252026
Jan418.13419.47422.80426.65428.62
Feb419.24420.31424.55427.09429.35
Mar418.76421.00425.38428.15430.15
Apr420.19423.30426.51429.64431.12
May420.97424.01426.90430.51432.34
Jun420.94423.68426.91429.61431.44
Jul418.85421.83425.55427.87429.12
Aug417.15419.68422.99425.48—
Sep415.91418.50422.03424.37—
Oct415.74418.82422.38424.87—
Nov417.47420.46423.85426.46—
Dec418.99421.86425.40427.49—

Source: NOAA GML.

Implications for accounts

Three practices transfer directly from the NOAA record to accounting work. First, publish the file, not just the figure: a reader must be able to reach the rows a number came from. Second, version the release and say what changed — NOAA’s files carry creation dates and the bundle carries a changelog. Third, ask to be cited in a specific form, and make that form easy to copy; the citation block at the end of this report does the same for the report itself. Physical-science context for the trend is given by the IPCC’s Sixth Assessment Report (IPCC, 2021).

Data

References

IPCC. (2021). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (V. Masson-Delmotte, P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S. L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M. I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J. B. R. Matthews, T. K. Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yelekçi, R. Yu, & B. Zhou, Eds.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896
Keeling, C. D., Bacastow, R. B., Bainbridge, A. E., Ekdahl, C. A., Guenther, P. R., Waterman, L. S., & Chin, J. F. S. (1976). Atmospheric carbon dioxide variations at Mauna Loa Observatory, Hawaii. Tellus, 28(6), 538–551. https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v28i6.11322
Lan, X., Tans, P., & Thoning, K. W. (2026). Trends in globally-averaged CO2 determined from NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory measurements. NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory. https://doi.org/10.15138/9N0H-ZH07
Thoning, K. W., Tans, P. P., & Komhyr, W. D. (1989). Atmospheric carbon dioxide at Mauna Loa Observatory: 2. Analysis of the NOAA GMCC data, 1974–1985. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 94(D6), 8549–8565. https://doi.org/10.1029/JD094iD06p08549
United Nations, European Commission, FAO, IMF, OECD, & World Bank. (2021). System of Environmental-Economic Accounting—Ecosystem Accounting (SEEA EA) [Techreport]. United Nations.

Footnotes

  1. The annual increase for a year is the difference between that year’s mean and the previous year’s, as published in NOAA’s co2_gr_mlo.csv; NOAA’s uncertainty on each annual increment is about 0.1 ppm. ↩

Cite this report

CSDR Platform Team (2026). The Mauna Loa CO₂ record as a reference dataset: How a sixty-year atmospheric series is published, versioned and cited — and what environmental-economic accounts can borrow from it (v1.0). Centre for Sustainable Development Reform. https://test.csdr.global/reports/mauna-loa-reference-2026/

BibTeX
@techreport{csdr_mauna_loa_reference_2026_2026,
  title = {The Mauna Loa CO₂ record as a reference dataset: How a sixty-year atmospheric series is published, versioned and cited — and what environmental-economic accounts can borrow from it},
  author = {CSDR Platform Team},
  institution = {Centre for Sustainable Development Reform},
  year = {2026},
  version = {1.0},
  url = {https://test.csdr.global/reports/mauna-loa-reference-2026/}
}

Changelog

  • v1.0 (2026-08-18) — First release, built from the NOAA GML files dated 5 August 2026.

© 2026 Centre for Sustainable Development Reform. Licensed under CC BY 4.0.